Saturday, October 3, 2015

Strings Attached: Friends With Benefits Relationships in the Media


            In the movie No Strings Attached, the two main characters decide to enter into a “friends with benefits” relationship. Like the characters of Sex and the City who attempt to have sex like men, Emma (Natalie Portman) and Adam (Ashton Kutcher) initiate a relationship for the sole purpose of sexual satisfaction (Markle, 46). Initially their agreement appears to reflect post-feminist ideals because Emma does not conform to the more traditional sexual scripts of a woman. Rather than waiting to be chosen by a man, she demands the kind of behavior she requires Adam to display. In this regard, the audience can see a kind of sexual script reversal where Adam pursues a deeper emotional connection and Emma pushes him away. Like Sex and the City, one may initially think that this kind of media content empowers women by removing them from traditional feminine roles. Similar to the popular TV show, however, by the end of No Strings Attached Emma abandons the idea of “having sex like a man” in favor of a committed and loving relationship (Markle, 56).
        Around this time several other movies came out with similar themes (e.g. Friends with Benefits). In the end, the women always craved something more than a sexual relationship. This, I believe, actually reinforces more traditional female sexual scripts. Instead of showing women who can break free from these customary roles without regret, they show that women ultimately giving into their natural “need” to be in a relationship. Further, the women who fight being in a relationship are somehow punished for it. In No Strings Attached, Emma suffers for months after she refuses to be in a relationship with Adam. Ultimately, movies such as No Strings Attached can not be deemed as postfeminist because in the end they reinforce traditional sexual roles. 

Markle, G. (2008). “Can women have sex like a man?”: Sexual scripts in Sex and the City. Sexuality & Culture12(1), 45-57.

Romance, Taylor Swift, and the Heterosexual Script

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xg3vE8Ie_E

When I think of popular notions of romance, I think of very gendered and scripted examples with rigid rules. With these two ideas in mind, I wanted to explore how messages about gendered sexual scripts and romantic beliefs combine in popular songs, and how exposure to romantic messages could potentially feed into a consumer’s belief about gendered relationships. Specifically, I want to see how notions about romance and the heterosexual script combine in a popular (if a little old) Taylor Swift song.

Unsurprisingly, Taylor Swift’s “Love Song” contains and perpetuates all four domains of romantic beliefs measured by Lippman, Ward, and Seabrook (2014): Idealization, Love at First Sight, Love Finds A Way, and One and Only (133). In the song’s first line, the speaker says, “We were both young when I first saw you,” and then proceeds to recount the memory of meeting her significant other, signifying the significance of the first time they saw one another (l. 1). This focus on a picturesque and romantic first meeting feeds into the idea of Love at First Sight, or that one can fall in love at a first interaction.

Throughout the song, the speaker discusses the challenges and problems in the way of her relationship with her “Romeo.” Through it all, she continually reinforces her love for him; for example, she says things like “This love is difficult but it's real,” which shows that she thinks “real” love will last through the difficulties. In the end, their love works out despite all the opposition, showing that love finds a way – at least in this song. The speaker’s continual desire to run away with her significant other also feeds the idea of Idealization, because she believes that this romantic relationship will make solve her problems and erase everything that makes life difficult for her. Therefore, she idealizes the relationship and dreams about what it will bring her. Finally, the speaker also slightly touches on the idea of One and Only, or that there is only one person for her. She does this generally, with the idea that she continues to fight for the relationship instead of moving on, and specifically using lines like “you were everything to me” (l. 23). Clearly, “Love Song” portrays common and stereotypical media messages about romantic love.

But the romantic messages aren’t the only ones the song sends to listeners. The lyrics also adhere to gendered scripts, like the courtship script discussed in Kim et al (2007) which shows men as aggressive and women as passive. Specifically, the song emphasizes the man’s responsibility to take action and the woman’s passive position. For example, in the speaker’s rumination on the couple’s first meeting, she remembers that he came to talk to her – being the first to take initiative. When the speaker says, “Romeo, take me somewhere we can be alone / I’ll be waiting,” she clearly relies on her male counterpart to take action for her (ll. 13-4). Even when she says she grew tired of waiting and met him “on the outskirts of town,” she still asks him to save her. It seems she only has enough agency to put herself in the position to be saved by her man. Even looking outside of romantic love, she sings that one of the main obstacles in the way of her relationship is her father’s disapproval. Therefore, she is seemingly stuck between her father’s disapproval and her boyfriend’s pursuit, passively waiting for men to make life-altering decisions for her.

One potentially surprising aspect of this song, though, is that it doesn’t perpetuate any other parts of the heterosexual script. For example, both the speaker and her male counterpart seem to be equally committed – he willingly proposes marriage, as opposed to the commitment-phobia that a lot of male characters on television shows and films exhibit. Since the song is fairly G-rated, there isn’t a lot of room for the sexual double standard to show, and the narrow nature of the song doesn’t really allow for the audience to see whether the homophobia script plays out. So though the gendered courtship script is very evident, the rest of the heterosexual script is left out in favor of highly romantic content.


I think it’s important to look at these ideas together, the romantic beliefs and the heterosexual script, and identify how they exacerbate one another in media depictions. I’m curious to know if these aspects of the heterosexual script and romantic beliefs always correspond in the way that they do in this song, or if they sort of mix and match depending on the song’s content. Either way, as a life-long consumer of mass media – and a critical one as of late – I’d guess that this interplay between romance and gendered scripts is widespread over many types of media.

References:
Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44(2), 145-157. doi: 10.1080/00224490701263660

Lippman, J.R., Ward, L.M., & Seabrook, R.C. (2014). Isn’t it romantic? Differential associations between romantic screen media genres and romantic beliefs. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(3), 128-140. Doi:10.1037/ppm0000034

Swift, T. (2008). Love Story. On Fearless [CD]. Nashville: Blackbird Studios.

Friday, October 2, 2015

Have you met Ted?

Ted Mosby, the main character of How I Met Your Mother is the poster child of a hopeless romantic.  Throughout nine seasons of the show Ted is dedicated to finding his one true love, the woman he is going to make his wife.  If Ted had taken our romantic quiz in class he would have had the highest scores by far.  He believes that there is one true love for everyone, he believes marriage will be perfect once he finds his love, and believes that no matter what him and the woman he should be with will end up together some day. Ted throughout the nine seasons, shows all of the four subscales of romantic beliefs we learned from the reading “Isn’t it Romantic?”
            The first subscale “Love at first sight” is shown in the very first episode when Ted meets Robin.  In this clip Ted and Robin lock eyes from across the bar McClaren’s and immediately his eyes light up.  He starts telling his kids that at that moment he knew he was going to marry her someday.  However, this depiction of “love at first sight” is a bit different than usual because Robin does not turn out to be the mother! While we want to reward HIMYM for going against the norms of romanticism in media, we find out in the very last episode of the show that Ted indeed does end up with Robin much later in life. The show very much still falls into the trap of portraying “love at first sight” and depicting it as true.
The second subscale present in HIMYM is “Idealization.” In a clip where Ted talks to the mother for the very first time through a doorway, he confesses his love to her.  He explains to her that in 45 days they are going to meet and fall madly in love, get married and have two kids and they are going to have the perfect life together.  Because of how the show runs we never get to see much of the life that Ted and the mother have together but because of this once scene we know that it is nearly perfect in both of their eyes.  When I first saw this scene I cried my eyes out at how beautiful it was and still do, but now understand that I am a typical audience member that believes “Idealization” can exist right after this scene.


             Lastly, in HIMYM Ted goes through many relationships.  Every time that something does not work out whether it be because of a long distance relationship, wanting separate things, or falling out of love, Ted claims that the person just must not have been “the one.”  Looking back on some of the scenes now, it is apparent these were all aspects that love does NOT find a way.  For example, Ted and Robin break up in in season 2 because Robin does not want to get married and have kids.  Again it seems as if the show is breaking the norms of depicting that “love finds a way,” and managing to shock the audience. However, at the end of the entire season Ted and Robin end up together mending the hearts of all the fans and supporting the idea that "love finds a way." 

Once again, HIMYM despite trying to be different, falls victim to the four subscales of romantic media leaving its viewers with a happily ever after.   From the results of the “Isn’t it Romantic?” study, How I Met Your Mother does agree with the statistics that romantic beliefs are significantly present in sitcoms.  If viewers want a more realistic depiction of romance from HIMYM, they might have to start looking at some of Barney’s beliefs instead!  



      Lippman, J. R., Ward, L. M., & Seabrook, R. C. (2014). Isn’t it romantic? Differential associations between romantic screen media genres and romantic beliefs. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(3), 128-140. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000034